Analisis Penerapan ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) Reporting dalam Meningkatkan Transparansi Keuangan Perusahaan Terbuka

Authors

  • Fitri Dwi Jayanti Universitas Ngudi Waluyo

Keywords:

ESG Reporting, Transparansi Keuangan, Perusahaan Terbuka, Tata Kelola Perusahaan, Akuntabilitas

Abstract

This study analyzes the implementation of ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) reporting in improving financial transparency of public companies in Indonesia. The research method uses a quantitative approach with multiple linear regression analysis of 45 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2020-2023. Independent variables include ESG scores, environmental reporting quality, governance practices, and social responsibility programs. The dependent variable is the level of financial transparency measured through transparency and accountability indices. The results show that ESG reporting implementation has a positive and significant effect on financial transparency with an R-square value of 0.742. The governance component has the greatest influence with a coefficient of 0.534, followed by environmental aspects 0.387, and social 0.294. Companies with high ESG scores showed a 23.7% increase in transparency compared to companies with low ESG scores. This research provides theoretical contributions about the relationship between ESG reporting and financial transparency as well as practical implications for regulators and companies in improving the quality of financial reporting.

Abstrak

Penelitian ini menganalisis penerapan ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) reporting dalam meningkatkan transparansi keuangan perusahaan terbuka di Indonesia. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan analisis regresi linear berganda terhadap 45 perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2020-2023. Variabel independen meliputi skor ESG, kualitas pelaporan lingkungan, praktik tata kelola, dan program tanggung jawab sosial. Variabel dependen adalah tingkat transparansi keuangan yang diukur melalui indeks transparansi dan akuntabilitas. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan ESG reporting berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap transparansi keuangan dengan nilai R-square sebesar 0,742. Komponen governance memiliki pengaruh paling besar dengan koefisien 0,534, diikuti aspek environmental 0,387, dan social 0,294. Perusahaan dengan skor ESG tinggi menunjukkan peningkatan transparansi sebesar 23,7% dibandingkan perusahaan dengan skor ESG rendah. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi teoritis tentang hubungan ESG reporting dan transparansi keuangan serta implikasi praktis bagi regulator dan perusahaan dalam meningkatkan kualitas pelaporan keuangan.        

References

Bushman, R. M., Piotroski, J. D., & Smith, A. J. (2004). What determines corporate transparency? Journal of Accounting Research, 42(2), 207-252.

Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.

Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59-100.

Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122-136.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74.

El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388-2406.

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing.

Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Indonesian Institute for Corporate Governance. (2023). Survey Implementasi ESG Reporting di Indonesia. Jakarta: IICG Press.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

Lindblom, C. K. (1994). The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, New York.

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2021). Roadmap Keuangan Berkelanjutan Tahap II (2021-2025). Jakarta: OJK.

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.

Sustainable Investment Forum Indonesia. (2023). Indonesia Sustainable Investment Report 2023. Jakarta: SIFI.

Sutrisno, P., & Kartika, A. (2021). Environmental disclosure dan transparansi laporan keuangan: Studi empiris perusahaan manufaktur Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 18(2), 145-162.

Wicaksono, B., & Adiwibowo, S. (2022). Implementasi ESG reporting dan nilai perusahaan BUMN Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 15(3), 287-304.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-04